PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
244.60%
Some net income increase while CORZ is negative at -261.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.14%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CORZ at -4.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
111.34%
Deferred tax of 111.34% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.06%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
3.28%
Less working capital growth vs. CORZ's 503.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
217.03%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. CORZ's 382766.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-118.41%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
4.93%
Lower AP growth vs. CORZ's 85.42%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-57.68%
Negative yoy usage while CORZ is 156.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-163.86%
Negative yoy while CORZ is 221.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
26.09%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CORZ's 183.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
23.86%
Some CapEx rise while CORZ is negative at -37.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
37.70%
Acquisition growth of 37.70% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-48.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.26%
Liquidation growth of 51.26% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
2166.67%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CORZ's 4741.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
0.02%
We have mild expansions while CORZ is negative at -27.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
46.30%
We repay more while CORZ is negative at -21.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
45.03%
Stock issuance far above CORZ's 36.84%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-11.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.