503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.22%
Some net income increase while CORZ is negative at -261.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.92%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CORZ at -4.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
102.40%
Deferred tax of 102.40% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
5.87%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
8.23%
Less working capital growth vs. CORZ's 503.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
218.07%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. CORZ's 382766.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-551.56%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-2505.88%
Negative yoy AP while CORZ is 85.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-47.18%
Negative yoy usage while CORZ is 156.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-3.14%
Negative yoy while CORZ is 221.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
36.45%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CORZ's 183.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
18.53%
Some CapEx rise while CORZ is negative at -37.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
61.90%
Acquisition growth of 61.90% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-89.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
79.59%
Liquidation growth of 79.59% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-7.69%
We reduce yoy other investing while CORZ is 4741.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-83.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -27.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-800.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -21.02%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
39.31%
Stock issuance far above CORZ's 36.84%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-18.63%
We cut yoy buybacks while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.