PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.87%
Some net income increase while CORZ is negative at -261.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
19.27%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -4.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-4013.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.10%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-25.63%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CORZ is 503.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-137.79%
AR is negative yoy while CORZ is 382766.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
230.57%
Inventory growth of 230.57% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
122.35%
AP growth well above CORZ's 85.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
24.39%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CORZ's 156.60%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-8.19%
Negative yoy while CORZ is 221.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-45.51%
Negative yoy CFO while CORZ is 183.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
8.09%
Some CapEx rise while CORZ is negative at -37.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-103066.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
18.20%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. CORZ's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
40.80%
Liquidation growth of 40.80% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
1373.81%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CORZ's 4741.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
20.14%
We have mild expansions while CORZ is negative at -27.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1730.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -21.02%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-45.64%
Negative yoy issuance while CORZ is 36.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.49%
Buyback growth of 17.49% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.