503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.67%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CORZ at -261.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
13.25%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -4.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-32.37%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
15.12%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
44.37%
Less working capital growth vs. CORZ's 503.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
154.85%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. CORZ's 382766.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-101.41%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-529.29%
Negative yoy AP while CORZ is 85.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
22.45%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CORZ's 156.60%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-8.63%
Negative yoy while CORZ is 221.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
69.39%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CORZ's 183.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
14.74%
Some CapEx rise while CORZ is negative at -37.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
96.76%
Acquisition growth of 96.76% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
6.11%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. CORZ's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-28.42%
We reduce yoy sales while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-200.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while CORZ is 4741.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
58.03%
We have mild expansions while CORZ is negative at -27.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
94.88%
We repay more while CORZ is negative at -21.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
36.64%
Stock issuance far above CORZ's 36.84%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
42.71%
Buyback growth of 42.71% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.