503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.97%
Some net income increase while CORZ is negative at -261.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.66%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -4.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
97.28%
Deferred tax of 97.28% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
6.57%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-85.12%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CORZ is 503.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
215.62%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. CORZ's 382766.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-414.07%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-147.88%
Negative yoy AP while CORZ is 85.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-113.57%
Negative yoy usage while CORZ is 156.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
96.88%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. CORZ's 221.96%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
13.04%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CORZ's 183.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
6.61%
Some CapEx rise while CORZ is negative at -37.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
50.00%
Acquisition growth of 50.00% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-13.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
15.80%
Liquidation growth of 15.80% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
202.91%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CORZ's 4741.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
6.31%
We have mild expansions while CORZ is negative at -27.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
65.29%
We repay more while CORZ is negative at -21.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
38.91%
Stock issuance far above CORZ's 36.84%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-45.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.