503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Some net income increase while CORZ is negative at -261.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.38%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -4.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-125.40%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.82%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
68.49%
Less working capital growth vs. CORZ's 503.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1149.94%
AR is negative yoy while CORZ is 382766.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-238.67%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
454.21%
AP growth well above CORZ's 85.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
13958.21%
Growth well above CORZ's 156.60%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-251.92%
Negative yoy while CORZ is 221.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.68%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CORZ's 183.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -37.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-401.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.66%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
9.95%
Liquidation growth of 9.95% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-129.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while CORZ is 4741.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-8849.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -27.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while CORZ is negative at -21.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-0.58%
Negative yoy issuance while CORZ is 36.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.96%
Buyback growth of 17.96% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.