PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.86%
Negative net income growth while CORZ stands at 46.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.92%
Less D&A growth vs. CORZ's 30.06%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-208.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CORZ stands at 128.14%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.47%
SBC growth of 0.47% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
132.15%
Slight usage while CORZ is negative at -96.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
115.46%
AR growth while CORZ is negative at -82.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-170.81%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
121.28%
A yoy AP increase while CORZ is negative at -109.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
142.54%
Some yoy usage while CORZ is negative at -92.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
134.20%
Some yoy increase while CORZ is negative at -48.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
75.32%
Some CFO growth while CORZ is negative at -135.94%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.95%
Lower CapEx growth vs. CORZ's 97.21%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-2102.24%
Negative yoy acquisition while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-248.22%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
118.36%
Liquidation growth of 118.36% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-1226.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -104.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1292.85%
We reduce yoy invests while CORZ stands at 96.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.92%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. CORZ's 203.54%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-18.69%
We cut yoy buybacks while CORZ is 91.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.