PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.44%
Net income growth under 50% of CORZ's 41.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.86%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -1.97%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
13.45%
Deferred tax of 13.45% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.26%
Negative yoy SBC while CORZ is 16.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
184.85%
Slight usage while CORZ is negative at -44.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-553.16%
AR is negative yoy while CORZ is 688.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-78.85%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
548.77%
A yoy AP increase while CORZ is negative at -295.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
344.01%
Some yoy usage while CORZ is negative at -47.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
53.75%
Some yoy increase while CORZ is negative at -14.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.54%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of CORZ's 141.64%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-26.67%
Negative yoy CapEx while CORZ is 7.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
14.79%
Acquisition growth of 14.79% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-29.68%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-32.34%
We reduce yoy sales while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
70.18%
Growth well above CORZ's 39.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-38.77%
We reduce yoy invests while CORZ stands at 7.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-54.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CORZ is 4697.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2.30%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. CORZ's 100.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
0.07%
Buyback growth of 0.07% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.