PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.94%
Net income growth under 50% of CORZ's 318.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.72%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -23.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-25.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.04%
SBC growth while CORZ is negative at -32.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-88.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CORZ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
205.97%
AR growth while CORZ is negative at -99.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-778.18%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-121.79%
Both negative yoy AP, with CORZ at -2161.87%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-173.54%
Negative yoy usage while CORZ is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-100.51%
Both negative yoy, with CORZ at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.11%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with CORZ at -394.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-7.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -207.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-37.78%
Negative yoy acquisition while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
42.78%
Purchases growth of 42.78% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
14.64%
Liquidation growth of 14.64% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-139.01%
We reduce yoy other investing while CORZ is 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -224.53%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
52.09%
We repay more while CORZ is negative at -100.09%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
32.21%
Issuance growth of 32.21% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
2.45%
Buyback growth of 2.45% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.