PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.27%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CORZ at -261.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-7.53%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CORZ at -4.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
19.19%
Deferred tax of 19.19% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
9.07%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-1449.42%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CORZ is 503.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-142.59%
AR is negative yoy while CORZ is 382766.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
290.62%
Inventory growth of 290.62% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
204.59%
AP growth well above CORZ's 85.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
39.10%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CORZ's 156.60%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
880.80%
Well above CORZ's 221.96%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-34.78%
Negative yoy CFO while CORZ is 183.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-5.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -37.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24.01%
Acquisition growth of 24.01% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-26.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
25.80%
Liquidation growth of 25.80% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
98.25%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CORZ's 4741.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
7.16%
We have mild expansions while CORZ is negative at -27.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while CORZ is negative at -21.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-63.74%
Negative yoy issuance while CORZ is 36.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-21.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.