PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.12%
Some net income increase while CRWD is negative at -135.78%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
28.02%
D&A growth well above CRWD's 5.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-93.78%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CRWD stands at 88.47%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.53%
Negative yoy SBC while CRWD is 3.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
117.68%
Well above CRWD's 88.72% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
58.83%
AR growth while CRWD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-92.69%
Negative yoy inventory while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
23.07%
Lower AP growth vs. CRWD's 100.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
145.18%
Growth well above CRWD's 93.78%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-130.53%
Negative yoy while CRWD is 7.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
66.18%
Some CFO growth while CRWD is negative at -0.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-5.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRWD at -100.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
30.18%
Some acquisitions while CRWD is negative at -9900.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-118.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRWD at -545.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
72.03%
We have some liquidation growth while CRWD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
3875.00%
We have some outflow growth while CRWD is negative at -8.65%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
9.91%
We have mild expansions while CRWD is negative at -92.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.28%
We slightly raise equity while CRWD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
4.11%
Buyback growth of 4.11% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.