PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-3.33%
Negative net income growth while CRWD stands at 30.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-10.73%
Negative yoy D&A while CRWD is 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.06%
Slight usage while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.06%
Growth well above CRWD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
53.46%
Well above CRWD's 14.15%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
24.78%
Some CFO growth while CRWD is negative at -13.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
62.96%
CapEx growth well above CRWD's 64.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.62%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRWD stands at 31.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRWD at -9.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-81.79%
We reduce yoy invests while CRWD stands at 52.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.94%
We slightly raise equity while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-181.72%
We cut yoy buybacks while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.