PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.11%
Negative net income growth while CRWD stands at 30.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-17.00%
Negative yoy D&A while CRWD is 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
105.48%
Well above CRWD's 61.99% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-76.86%
Negative yoy SBC while CRWD is 13.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
586.33%
Slight usage while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
169.42%
AR growth while CRWD is negative at -124.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.85%
Growth well above CRWD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-977.46%
Negative yoy while CRWD is 14.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
8.66%
Some CFO growth while CRWD is negative at -13.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.84%
Negative yoy CapEx while CRWD is 64.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. CRWD's 31.64%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-7.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with CRWD at -36.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.13%
Investing outflow well above CRWD's 52.10%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
200.53%
We slightly raise equity while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-120.27%
We cut yoy buybacks while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.