PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.02%
Negative net income growth while CRWD stands at 30.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-40.78%
Negative yoy D&A while CRWD is 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
152.89%
Well above CRWD's 61.99% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
118.72%
SBC growth well above CRWD's 13.23%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
117.78%
Slight usage while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
180.46%
AR growth while CRWD is negative at -124.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.01%
Growth well above CRWD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-110.49%
Negative yoy while CRWD is 14.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
141.68%
Some CFO growth while CRWD is negative at -13.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
68.94%
CapEx growth well above CRWD's 64.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while CRWD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-14.14%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRWD stands at 31.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-28.22%
Both yoy lines are negative, with CRWD at -36.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-319.86%
We reduce yoy invests while CRWD stands at 52.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-62.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRWD at -200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.