PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-39.87%
Negative net income growth while CRWD stands at 30.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.85%
D&A growth well above CRWD's 6.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-143.82%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CRWD stands at 61.99%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.82%
Negative yoy SBC while CRWD is 13.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
402.45%
Slight usage while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
169.81%
AR growth while CRWD is negative at -124.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while CRWD is 184.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-30.43%
Negative yoy usage while CRWD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
83.77%
Well above CRWD's 14.15%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
48.78%
Some CFO growth while CRWD is negative at -13.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-8.51%
Negative yoy CapEx while CRWD is 64.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-126.98%
Negative yoy acquisition while CRWD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-161.65%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRWD stands at 31.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
11.55%
We have some liquidation growth while CRWD is negative at -36.63%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while CRWD is negative at -9.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-6317.39%
We reduce yoy invests while CRWD stands at 52.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
18.80%
Debt repayment growth of 18.80% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
339.58%
We slightly raise equity while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
47.69%
Buyback growth of 47.69% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.