PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.89%
Negative net income growth while CRWD stands at 30.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.98%
D&A growth well above CRWD's 6.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1057.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CRWD stands at 61.99%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.78%
Less SBC growth vs. CRWD's 13.23%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
86.98%
Slight usage while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
175.85%
AR growth while CRWD is negative at -124.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-105.61%
Negative yoy inventory while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-164.77%
Negative yoy AP while CRWD is 184.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
1.75%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CRWD's 100.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-0.64%
Negative yoy while CRWD is 14.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.66%
Some CFO growth while CRWD is negative at -13.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-50.40%
Negative yoy CapEx while CRWD is 64.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
99.03%
Acquisition growth of 99.03% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-138.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRWD stands at 31.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-12.33%
Both yoy lines are negative, with CRWD at -36.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
223.63%
We have some outflow growth while CRWD is negative at -9.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-119.85%
We reduce yoy invests while CRWD stands at 52.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.30%
We slightly raise equity while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
1.82%
Buyback growth of 1.82% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.