PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.05%
Negative net income growth while CRWD stands at 30.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.36%
D&A growth well above CRWD's 6.21%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
61.43%
Well above CRWD's 61.99% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.66%
Negative yoy SBC while CRWD is 13.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
88.04%
Slight usage while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
148.82%
AR growth while CRWD is negative at -124.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-1363.64%
Negative yoy inventory while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-109.78%
Negative yoy AP while CRWD is 184.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
7.23%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CRWD's 100.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-11.34%
Negative yoy while CRWD is 14.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
102.22%
Some CFO growth while CRWD is negative at -13.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.27%
Acquisition growth of 65.27% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-80.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRWD stands at 31.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
20.63%
We have some liquidation growth while CRWD is negative at -36.63%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
238.17%
We have some outflow growth while CRWD is negative at -9.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-195.41%
We reduce yoy invests while CRWD stands at 52.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
40.00%
We slightly raise equity while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
38.00%
Buyback growth of 38.00% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.