PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
244.60%
Net income growth above 1.5x CRWD's 30.05%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.14%
Negative yoy D&A while CRWD is 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
111.34%
Well above CRWD's 61.99% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
3.06%
Less SBC growth vs. CRWD's 13.23%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
3.28%
Slight usage while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
217.03%
AR growth while CRWD is negative at -124.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-118.41%
Negative yoy inventory while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
4.93%
Lower AP growth vs. CRWD's 184.01%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-57.68%
Negative yoy usage while CRWD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-163.86%
Negative yoy while CRWD is 14.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
26.09%
Some CFO growth while CRWD is negative at -13.35%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
23.86%
Lower CapEx growth vs. CRWD's 64.44%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
37.70%
Acquisition growth of 37.70% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-48.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRWD stands at 31.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.26%
We have some liquidation growth while CRWD is negative at -36.63%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
2166.67%
We have some outflow growth while CRWD is negative at -9.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
0.02%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. CRWD's 52.10%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
46.30%
Debt repayment growth of 46.30% while CRWD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
45.03%
We slightly raise equity while CRWD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-11.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.