PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.32%
Net income growth under 50% of CRWD's 214.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.14%
Less D&A growth vs. CRWD's 13.43%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
22.27%
Some yoy growth while CRWD is negative at -1964.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-4.42%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CRWD at -3.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
124.49%
Well above CRWD's 50.75% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
31.28%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. CRWD's 73.38%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-82.36%
Negative yoy inventory while CRWD is 631.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
125.70%
A yoy AP increase while CRWD is negative at -65.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
157.79%
Some yoy usage while CRWD is negative at -264.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
7943.43%
Well above CRWD's 1.59%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
69.29%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x CRWD's 11.74%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-12.50%
Negative yoy CapEx while CRWD is 39.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
97.58%
Some acquisitions while CRWD is negative at -144.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
48.73%
Some yoy expansion while CRWD is negative at -8618.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-7.98%
We reduce yoy sales while CRWD is 138.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-195.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRWD at -344.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
85.12%
We have mild expansions while CRWD is negative at -1222.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-210.25%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while CRWD is negative at -95.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-5.33%
We cut yoy buybacks while CRWD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.