503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
3.72%
Less D&A growth vs. CRWV's 26.15%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1544.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CRWV at -110.52%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1544.12%
Negative yoy usage while CRWV is 112.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
253.04%
Well above CRWV's 23.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
26.32%
Some CFO growth while CRWV is negative at -510.76%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.65%
Some CapEx rise while CRWV is negative at -74.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.43%
Purchases growth of 62.43% while CRWV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.50%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CRWV's 202.79%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
46.99%
We have mild expansions while CRWV is negative at -70.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
486.78%
Stock issuance far above CRWV's 4.88%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
98.68%
Buyback growth of 98.68% while CRWV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.