PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.31%
Negative yoy D&A while CRWV is 26.15%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
652.54%
Well above CRWV's 3.70% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
0.55%
SBC growth while CRWV is negative at -21.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-303.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CRWV at -110.52%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-261.20%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with CRWV at -35.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-78.24%
Negative yoy inventory while CRWV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
674.51%
A yoy AP increase while CRWV is negative at -663.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-2062.86%
Negative yoy usage while CRWV is 112.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
875.05%
Well above CRWV's 23.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-31.48%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with CRWV at -510.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
2.43%
Some CapEx rise while CRWV is negative at -74.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
98.60%
Acquisition growth of 98.60% while CRWV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
42.43%
Purchases growth of 42.43% while CRWV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
12.70%
We have some liquidation growth while CRWV is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-3421.88%
We reduce yoy other investing while CRWV is 202.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
86.69%
We have mild expansions while CRWV is negative at -70.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-975.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRWV at -200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-260.21%
Negative yoy issuance while CRWV is 4.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-48.11%
We cut yoy buybacks while CRWV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.