PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.59%
Net income growth above 1.5x CRWV's 7.67%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-3.95%
Negative yoy D&A while CRWV is 26.15%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-17458.82%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CRWV stands at 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.34%
SBC growth while CRWV is negative at -21.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
205.26%
Slight usage while CRWV is negative at -110.52%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
190.35%
AR growth while CRWV is negative at -35.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-100.26%
Negative yoy inventory while CRWV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-129.13%
Both negative yoy AP, with CRWV at -663.96%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-131.10%
Negative yoy usage while CRWV is 112.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
12.50%
Well above CRWV's 23.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.06%
Some CFO growth while CRWV is negative at -510.76%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
9.95%
Some CapEx rise while CRWV is negative at -74.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-140.72%
Negative yoy acquisition while CRWV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
30.71%
Purchases growth of 30.71% while CRWV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
37.46%
We have some liquidation growth while CRWV is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-196.08%
We reduce yoy other investing while CRWV is 202.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
70.05%
We have mild expansions while CRWV is negative at -70.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.00%
Stock issuance far above CRWV's 4.88%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-7.06%
We cut yoy buybacks while CRWV is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.