503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.89%
Negative net income growth while CRWV stands at 7.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
51.98%
D&A growth well above CRWV's 26.15%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-199.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CRWV stands at 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
12.80%
SBC growth while CRWV is negative at -21.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-525.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CRWV at -110.52%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-126.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with CRWV at -35.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
391.88%
Inventory growth of 391.88% while CRWV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-307.66%
Both negative yoy AP, with CRWV at -663.96%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
32.42%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CRWV's 112.72%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
1314.29%
Well above CRWV's 23.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-38.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with CRWV at -510.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.84%
Some CapEx rise while CRWV is negative at -74.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-5383.05%
Negative yoy acquisition while CRWV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
49.67%
Purchases growth of 49.67% while CRWV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-72.68%
Both yoy lines are negative, with CRWV at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
237.17%
Growth well above CRWV's 202.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-14399.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRWV at -70.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-94.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRWV at -200.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-61.90%
Negative yoy issuance while CRWV is 4.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.20%
Buyback growth of 17.20% while CRWV is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.