PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.12%
Some net income increase while NET is negative at -31.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
28.02%
Less D&A growth vs. NET's 61.03%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-93.78%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NET stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.53%
Negative yoy SBC while NET is 28.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
117.68%
Slight usage while NET is negative at -668.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
58.83%
AR growth while NET is negative at -211.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-92.69%
Negative yoy inventory while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
23.07%
Lower AP growth vs. NET's 170.67%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
145.18%
Some yoy usage while NET is negative at -77.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-130.53%
Both negative yoy, with NET at -46.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
66.18%
Some CFO growth while NET is negative at -31.55%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-5.95%
Negative yoy CapEx while NET is 22.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
30.18%
Acquisition growth of 30.18% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-118.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -179.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
72.03%
We have some liquidation growth while NET is negative at -1.64%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
3875.00%
Growth well above NET's 101.24%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
9.91%
We have mild expansions while NET is negative at -757.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.28%
Stock issuance far above NET's 76.06%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
4.11%
Buyback growth of 4.11% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.