PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.62%
Some net income increase while NET is negative at -31.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.95%
Negative yoy D&A while NET is 61.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
195.51%
Well above NET's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
5.66%
Less SBC growth vs. NET's 28.10%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-0.07%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NET at -668.77%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
216.78%
AR growth while NET is negative at -211.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-456.68%
Negative yoy inventory while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-156.79%
Negative yoy AP while NET is 170.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-67.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NET at -77.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
10.90%
Some yoy increase while NET is negative at -46.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
39.00%
Some CFO growth while NET is negative at -31.55%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
31.38%
CapEx growth well above NET's 22.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
25.00%
Acquisition growth of 25.00% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
45.35%
Some yoy expansion while NET is negative at -179.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-49.98%
Both yoy lines are negative, with NET at -1.64%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-179.01%
We reduce yoy other investing while NET is 101.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
20.98%
We have mild expansions while NET is negative at -757.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
25.71%
Debt repayment growth of 25.71% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
22.29%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. NET's 76.06%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-109.98%
We cut yoy buybacks while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.