PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.67%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with NET at -31.19%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
13.25%
Less D&A growth vs. NET's 61.03%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-32.37%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NET stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
15.12%
SBC growth well above NET's 28.10%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
44.37%
Slight usage while NET is negative at -668.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
154.85%
AR growth while NET is negative at -211.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-101.41%
Negative yoy inventory while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-529.29%
Negative yoy AP while NET is 170.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
22.45%
Some yoy usage while NET is negative at -77.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-8.63%
Both negative yoy, with NET at -46.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
69.39%
Some CFO growth while NET is negative at -31.55%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
CapEx growth well above NET's 22.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
96.76%
Acquisition growth of 96.76% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
6.11%
Some yoy expansion while NET is negative at -179.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-28.42%
Both yoy lines are negative, with NET at -1.64%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-200.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while NET is 101.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
58.03%
We have mild expansions while NET is negative at -757.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
94.88%
Debt repayment growth of 94.88% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
36.64%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. NET's 76.06%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
42.71%
Buyback growth of 42.71% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.