PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
35.66%
Some net income increase while NET is negative at -31.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.48%
Negative yoy D&A while NET is 61.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-150.58%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NET stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.40%
Less SBC growth vs. NET's 28.10%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
5.93%
Slight usage while NET is negative at -668.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-562.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NET at -211.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-1143.75%
Negative yoy inventory while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
300.00%
AP growth well above NET's 170.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
47.16%
Some yoy usage while NET is negative at -77.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-7.95%
Both negative yoy, with NET at -46.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
3.24%
Some CFO growth while NET is negative at -31.55%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-34.69%
Negative yoy CapEx while NET is 22.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
55.36%
Acquisition growth of 55.36% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
33.90%
Some yoy expansion while NET is negative at -179.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-40.91%
Both yoy lines are negative, with NET at -1.64%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
90.46%
Growth well above NET's 101.24%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-19.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -757.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1496.21%
We cut debt repayment yoy while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
23.46%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. NET's 76.06%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
14.40%
Buyback growth of 14.40% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.