PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.03%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with NET at -16.31%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.61%
Less D&A growth vs. NET's 23.46%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-83.45%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
6.05%
SBC growth well above NET's 11.04%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
130.75%
Slight usage while NET is negative at -173.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
200.20%
AR growth while NET is negative at -146.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-396.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with NET at -274.88%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-143.28%
Negative yoy AP while NET is 551.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-165.97%
Negative yoy usage while NET is 99.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
103.42%
Well above NET's 121.20%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-14.22%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with NET at -66.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.44%
Some CapEx rise while NET is negative at -9.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-64.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -613.13%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-51.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while NET stands at 70.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
103.41%
Below 50% of NET's 208.87%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
170.80%
Growth well above NET's 108.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
75.53%
Investing outflow well above NET's 97.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-150.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -440.54%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
38.64%
Issuance growth of 38.64% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-6.02%
We cut yoy buybacks while NET is 45.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.