PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.09%
Net income growth under 50% of NET's 20.19%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
7.81%
D&A growth well above NET's 9.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
85.08%
Some yoy growth while NET is negative at -2040.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
6.18%
SBC growth while NET is negative at -3.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-298.63%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NET is 66.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-141.66%
AR is negative yoy while NET is 48.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
242.42%
Inventory growth well above NET's 89.37%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
98.72%
AP growth well above NET's 87.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
79.10%
Some yoy usage while NET is negative at -6597.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-1945.45%
Negative yoy while NET is 40.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-22.71%
Negative yoy CFO while NET is 127.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-4.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -47.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
82.68%
Acquisition spending well above NET's 99.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
18.72%
Some yoy expansion while NET is negative at -323.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-34.80%
We reduce yoy sales while NET is 46.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-216.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -126340.81%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-239.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -3328.74%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.28%
We repay more while NET is negative at -33566.50%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-45.20%
Negative yoy issuance while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-5.99%
We cut yoy buybacks while NET is 55.71%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.