PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Some net income increase while NET is negative at -28.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.38%
D&A growth well above NET's 11.16%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-125.40%
Negative yoy deferred tax while NET stands at 115.83%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.82%
Less SBC growth vs. NET's 10.16%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
68.49%
Slight usage while NET is negative at -98.68%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1149.94%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NET at -181.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-238.67%
Negative yoy inventory while NET is 16.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
454.21%
A yoy AP increase while NET is negative at -1039.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
13958.21%
Some yoy usage while NET is negative at -45.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-251.92%
Negative yoy while NET is 14.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.68%
Some CFO growth while NET is negative at -546.68%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-25.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while NET is 26.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-401.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -105.59%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-18.66%
Negative yoy purchasing while NET stands at 17.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
9.95%
Below 50% of NET's 70.08%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-129.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while NET is 100.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-8849.02%
We reduce yoy invests while NET stands at 99.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-0.58%
Negative yoy issuance while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.96%
We have some buyback growth while NET is negative at -266.67%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.