PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.94%
Some net income increase while NET is negative at -199.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
15.72%
D&A growth well above NET's 16.45%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-25.15%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.04%
SBC growth well above NET's 1.10%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-88.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NET is 142.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
205.97%
AR growth well above NET's 139.01%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-778.18%
Negative yoy inventory while NET is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-121.79%
Both negative yoy AP, with NET at -107.79%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-173.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with NET at -148.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.51%
Negative yoy while NET is 17.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-8.11%
Negative yoy CFO while NET is 14.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-7.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with NET at -17.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-37.78%
Negative yoy acquisition while NET stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
42.78%
Some yoy expansion while NET is negative at -4.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
14.64%
At 50-75% of NET's 27.61%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
-139.01%
We reduce yoy other investing while NET is 60.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2.38%
We reduce yoy invests while NET stands at 44.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
52.09%
Debt repayment growth of 52.09% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
32.21%
Issuance growth of 32.21% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
2.45%
Buyback growth of 2.45% while NET is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.