PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-40.74%
Negative net income growth while ORCL stands at 40.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-8.54%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ORCL at -1.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-16516.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ORCL stands at 276.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
186.92%
Slight usage while ORCL is negative at -146.55%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.96%
Some yoy usage while ORCL is negative at -146.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-114.12%
Negative yoy while ORCL is 111.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.59%
Some CFO growth while ORCL is negative at -72.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-2.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while ORCL is 64.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
9.03%
Some yoy expansion while ORCL is negative at -12.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-2.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ORCL is 118.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
Investing outflow well above ORCL's 67.27%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.81%
Negative yoy issuance while ORCL is 229.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
30.14%
Buyback growth below 50% of ORCL's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.