PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.78%
Negative net income growth while ORCL stands at 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.60%
Some D&A expansion while ORCL is negative at -0.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-68.11%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ORCL stands at 39.58%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.61%
SBC growth of 3.61% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
182.16%
Well above ORCL's 112.27% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
171.81%
AR growth of 171.81% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.43%
Negative yoy usage while ORCL is 112.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-119.24%
Both negative yoy, with ORCL at -9.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
55.07%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ORCL's 199.67%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-9.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while ORCL is 43.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
68.13%
Acquisition spending well above ORCL's 53.33%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
44.89%
Some yoy expansion while ORCL is negative at -58.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-54.07%
We reduce yoy sales while ORCL is 76.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
140.13%
Growth of 140.13% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
25.83%
Investing outflow well above ORCL's 32.18%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.52%
Negative yoy issuance while ORCL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
69.44%
We have some buyback growth while ORCL is negative at -0.81%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.