PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.37%
Some net income increase while ORCL is negative at -40.56%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-5.14%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ORCL at -1.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-115.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ORCL stands at 19.35%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.49%
Less SBC growth vs. ORCL's 210.53%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
143.11%
Less working capital growth vs. ORCL's 432.58%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
250.99%
AR growth well above ORCL's 203.20%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.01%
Negative yoy usage while ORCL is 194.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-81.69%
Negative yoy while ORCL is 123.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
59.00%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of ORCL's 86.16%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
49.83%
Some CapEx rise while ORCL is negative at -44.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
4.88%
Some acquisitions while ORCL is negative at -1416.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
26.36%
Some yoy expansion while ORCL is negative at -14.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
18.71%
We have some liquidation growth while ORCL is negative at -2.99%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Growth well above ORCL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
84.74%
We have mild expansions while ORCL is negative at -118.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
78.06%
Debt repayment growth of 78.06% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
73.43%
We slightly raise equity while ORCL is negative at -20.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-6900.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while ORCL is 8.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.