PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.32%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ORCL at -42.66%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.37%
D&A growth well above ORCL's 3.65%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
23.31%
Well above ORCL's 2.53% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
2.57%
Less SBC growth vs. ORCL's 16.54%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
147.46%
Less working capital growth vs. ORCL's 834.38%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
196.87%
AR growth well above ORCL's 217.90%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-203.63%
Negative yoy inventory while ORCL is 400.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-250.85%
Both negative yoy AP, with ORCL at -296.01%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
9.11%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ORCL's 56.47%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-138.78%
Both negative yoy, with ORCL at -98.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
42.93%
Operating cash flow growth similar to ORCL's 43.53%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
32.09%
Some CapEx rise while ORCL is negative at -105.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-43650.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -97.13%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-36.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -54.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
14.57%
We have some liquidation growth while ORCL is negative at -14.99%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
93.79%
We have some outflow growth while ORCL is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-143.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -1409.07%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
114.93%
We slightly raise equity while ORCL is negative at -47.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-53.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -94.65%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.