PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-109.63%
Negative net income growth while ORCL stands at 38.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.05%
D&A growth well above ORCL's 6.30%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
601.49%
Well above ORCL's 154.78% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-12.01%
Negative yoy SBC while ORCL is 5.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-17.51%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ORCL at -99.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-280.76%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ORCL at -1936.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
626.00%
Some inventory rise while ORCL is negative at -76.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
406.14%
Lower AP growth vs. ORCL's 1446.81%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
56.17%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ORCL's 369.69%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
59.93%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ORCL's 122.69%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-19.98%
Negative yoy CFO while ORCL is 34.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.96%
Some CapEx rise while ORCL is negative at -52.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-526.19%
Negative yoy acquisition while ORCL stands at 17.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
50.09%
Some yoy expansion while ORCL is negative at -6.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-27.47%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ORCL at -10.01%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-209.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while ORCL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
61.91%
We have mild expansions while ORCL is negative at -212.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-249.86%
Negative yoy issuance while ORCL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -44.61%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.