PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x ORCL's 14.51%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.51%
D&A growth well above ORCL's 3.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
4.32%
Some yoy growth while ORCL is negative at -272.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.01%
Negative yoy SBC while ORCL is 11.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-38.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ORCL at -162.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-150.97%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ORCL at -127.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
321.53%
Some inventory rise while ORCL is negative at -60.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
120.79%
AP growth well above ORCL's 120.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
40.20%
Some yoy usage while ORCL is negative at -181.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-5.46%
Both negative yoy, with ORCL at -18.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-48.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ORCL at -84.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-16.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -11.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1881.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -13643.24%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
20.42%
Purchases well above ORCL's 30.62%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
1.98%
Below 50% of ORCL's 61.81%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
164.85%
Growth well above ORCL's 86.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
39.05%
Investing outflow well above ORCL's 7.33%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-219.87%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ORCL is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-43.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -46.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
25.73%
We have some buyback growth while ORCL is negative at -4.35%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.