Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-164.09%
Negative net income growth while ORCL stands at 10.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.45%
Negative yoy D&A while ORCL is 1.85%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-354.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ORCL stands at 62.42%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.03%
Less SBC growth vs. ORCL's 4.27%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-4.39%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ORCL is 136.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-249.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ORCL at -3068.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
0.23%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ORCL's 80.43%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
63.59%
Lower AP growth vs. ORCL's 523.03%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
77.69%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ORCL's 179.80%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
61.29%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ORCL's 202.56%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-28.78%
Negative yoy CFO while ORCL is 89.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-28.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -62.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-286.42%
Negative yoy acquisition while ORCL stands at 99.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.41%
Some yoy expansion while ORCL is negative at -38.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-15.11%
We reduce yoy sales while ORCL is 1.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
99.10%
We have some outflow growth while ORCL is negative at -233.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
7.55%
We have mild expansions while ORCL is negative at -54.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
50.43%
Debt repayment growth of 50.43% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
3.42%
We slightly raise equity while ORCL is negative at -34.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
16.60%
We have some buyback growth while ORCL is negative at -0.80%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67