PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
244.60%
Some net income increase while ORCL is negative at -36.63%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.14%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ORCL at -6.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
111.34%
Well above ORCL's 51.61% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
3.06%
SBC growth well above ORCL's 3.69%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
3.28%
Less working capital growth vs. ORCL's 691.05%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
217.03%
AR growth well above ORCL's 234.12%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-118.41%
Negative yoy inventory while ORCL is 377.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
4.93%
A yoy AP increase while ORCL is negative at -193.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-57.68%
Negative yoy usage while ORCL is 300.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-163.86%
Both negative yoy, with ORCL at -48.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
26.09%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of ORCL's 36.73%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
23.86%
CapEx growth well above ORCL's 25.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
37.70%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. ORCL's 6471.43%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-48.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -44.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
51.26%
We have some liquidation growth while ORCL is negative at -6.41%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
2166.67%
Growth well above ORCL's 85.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
0.02%
We have mild expansions while ORCL is negative at -100.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
46.30%
Debt repayment well below ORCL's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
45.03%
We slightly raise equity while ORCL is negative at -17.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-11.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -45.22%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.