PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.87%
Net income growth similar to ORCL's 10.92%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
19.27%
D&A growth well above ORCL's 1.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-4013.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.10%
SBC growth well above ORCL's 2.51%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-25.63%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ORCL at -166.40%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-137.79%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ORCL at -115.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
230.57%
Inventory growth well above ORCL's 45.33%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
122.35%
AP growth well above ORCL's 150.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
24.39%
Some yoy usage while ORCL is negative at -206.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-8.19%
Both negative yoy, with ORCL at -68.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-45.51%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ORCL at -81.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
8.09%
Some CapEx rise while ORCL is negative at -153.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-103066.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -662.12%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
18.20%
Purchases well above ORCL's 16.98%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
40.80%
Below 50% of ORCL's 147.03%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
1373.81%
Growth well above ORCL's 93.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
20.14%
We have mild expansions while ORCL is negative at -86.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1730.22%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ORCL is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-45.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -46.82%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
17.49%
Buyback growth below 50% of ORCL's 73.07%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.