PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.70%
Negative net income growth while ORCL stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.65%
Negative yoy D&A while ORCL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
206.68%
Well above ORCL's 45.78% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.15%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ORCL at -9.07%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
135.21%
Well above ORCL's 78.81% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
121.20%
AR growth well above ORCL's 43.16%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-77.35%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ORCL at -355.04%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
7900.00%
A yoy AP increase while ORCL is negative at -15.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
104.88%
Growth well above ORCL's 114.04%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
125.62%
Some yoy increase while ORCL is negative at -12.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
63.90%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ORCL's 487.13%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-6.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -13.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-311.25%
Negative yoy acquisition while ORCL stands at 463.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.31%
Purchases well above ORCL's 13.27%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
20.83%
We have some liquidation growth while ORCL is negative at -46.28%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
272.00%
We have some outflow growth while ORCL is negative at -123.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.84%
We have mild expansions while ORCL is negative at -61.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-16566.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ORCL is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
46.15%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. ORCL's 104.32%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-35.59%
We cut yoy buybacks while ORCL is 20.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.