PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Net income growth under 50% of ORCL's 21.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
12.38%
Some D&A expansion while ORCL is negative at -3.48%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-125.40%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
0.82%
Less SBC growth vs. ORCL's 6.93%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
68.49%
Well above ORCL's 60.72% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-1149.94%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ORCL at -945.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-238.67%
Negative yoy inventory while ORCL is 141.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
454.21%
AP growth well above ORCL's 552.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
13958.21%
Some yoy usage while ORCL is negative at -12.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-251.92%
Negative yoy while ORCL is 44.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.68%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ORCL's 19.99%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -9.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-401.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -103.28%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-18.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -6172.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
9.95%
Below 50% of ORCL's 58.38%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-129.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -862.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-8849.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -986.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-0.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -42.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
17.96%
We have some buyback growth while ORCL is negative at -33.52%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.