PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.04%
Negative net income growth while ORCL stands at 105.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.34%
D&A growth well above ORCL's 0.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-417.65%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-2.62%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ORCL at -1.84%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
139.11%
Well above ORCL's 93.57% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
107.24%
AR growth while ORCL is negative at -193.55%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-141.75%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ORCL at -91.48%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
2424.24%
A yoy AP increase while ORCL is negative at -97.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
151.29%
Growth well above ORCL's 99.05%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
0.85%
Some yoy increase while ORCL is negative at -59.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
77.21%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ORCL's 166.86%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-21.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while ORCL is 27.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-1710.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -105.11%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-21.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -128.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
18.13%
We have some liquidation growth while ORCL is negative at -11.42%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
22.32%
We have some outflow growth while ORCL is negative at -417.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-480.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -187.85%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
84.62%
Debt repayment growth of 84.62% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
31.13%
We slightly raise equity while ORCL is negative at -30.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-6.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -0.34%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.