PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.48%
Some net income increase while ORCL is negative at -19.70%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.90%
D&A growth well above ORCL's 2.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
61.36%
Well above ORCL's 102.06% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
3.02%
SBC growth while ORCL is negative at -7.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-33.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ORCL at -20.86%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-4102.07%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ORCL at -334.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-17.93%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ORCL at -2400.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
94.12%
Lower AP growth vs. ORCL's 22300.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
538.20%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ORCL's 6220.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-18.52%
Both negative yoy, with ORCL at -718.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
2.39%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ORCL's 30.72%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-26.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -73.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.33%
Acquisition spending well above ORCL's 58.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
19.04%
Some yoy expansion while ORCL is negative at -0.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-49.54%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ORCL at -2.80%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
8.50%
We have some outflow growth while ORCL is negative at -8.19%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-12.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -15.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while ORCL is negative at -815.63%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
13.64%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. ORCL's 509.09%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-3.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -97.52%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.