PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-10.86%
Negative net income growth while ORCL stands at 285.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.92%
D&A growth well above ORCL's 2.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-208.20%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ORCL stands at 79.75%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.47%
SBC growth while ORCL is negative at -1.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
132.15%
Well above ORCL's 99.38% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
115.46%
AR growth while ORCL is negative at -117.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-170.81%
Negative yoy inventory while ORCL is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
121.28%
AP growth well above ORCL's 214.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
142.54%
Growth well above ORCL's 94.25%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
134.20%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ORCL's 273.15%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
75.32%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ORCL's 204.43%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
8.95%
Some CapEx rise while ORCL is negative at -19.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-2102.24%
Negative yoy acquisition while ORCL stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-248.22%
Negative yoy purchasing while ORCL stands at 74.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
118.36%
We have some liquidation growth while ORCL is negative at -69.75%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-1226.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -68.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1292.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -77.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.92%
We slightly raise equity while ORCL is negative at -66.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-18.69%
We cut yoy buybacks while ORCL is 89.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.