PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.07%
Net income growth under 50% of ORCL's 37.52%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.46%
D&A growth well above ORCL's 7.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
242.93%
Deferred tax of 242.93% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
4.77%
SBC growth well above ORCL's 5.79%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-52.05%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ORCL at -3916.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1574.21%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ORCL at -1013.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-65.23%
Negative yoy inventory while ORCL is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
411.35%
A yoy AP increase while ORCL is negative at -121.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
485.36%
Growth well above ORCL's 660.34%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
13722.86%
Some yoy increase while ORCL is negative at -46.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.98%
Negative yoy CFO while ORCL is 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-28.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -29.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.25%
Acquisition spending well above ORCL's 80.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
43.61%
Purchases well above ORCL's 72.56%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-74.92%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ORCL at -89.90%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
3.64%
We have some outflow growth while ORCL is negative at -92.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
39.84%
We have mild expansions while ORCL is negative at -147.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.35%
Negative yoy issuance while ORCL is 140.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
0.74%
Buyback growth below 50% of ORCL's 12.66%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.