PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.27%
Negative net income growth while ORCL stands at 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-7.53%
Negative yoy D&A while ORCL is 4.97%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
19.19%
Some yoy growth while ORCL is negative at -198.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.07%
SBC growth well above ORCL's 16.09%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-1449.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ORCL at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-142.59%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ORCL at -356.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
290.62%
Inventory growth of 290.62% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
204.59%
A yoy AP increase while ORCL is negative at -15.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
39.10%
Some yoy usage while ORCL is negative at -140.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
880.80%
Some yoy increase while ORCL is negative at -1623.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-34.78%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ORCL at -82.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-5.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -72.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24.01%
Acquisition growth of 24.01% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-26.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while ORCL stands at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
25.80%
Below 50% of ORCL's 2173.33%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
98.25%
Growth of 98.25% while ORCL is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
7.16%
We have mild expansions while ORCL is negative at -37.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment well below ORCL's 272.57%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-63.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with ORCL at -28.49%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-21.40%
We cut yoy buybacks while ORCL is 80.32%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.