PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.79%
Some net income increase while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
47.64%
D&A growth well above PANW's 0.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.34%
Well above PANW's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.36%
Negative yoy inventory while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2000.00%
Growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.60%
Some CFO growth while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-12.27%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-370.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while PANW stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-24.33%
We reduce yoy invests while PANW stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.32%
Negative yoy issuance while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-59.35%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.