PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.25%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
25.87%
D&A growth well above PANW's 0.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
36.18%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. PANW's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-395.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-395.14%
Negative yoy usage while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-49.68%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -110.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-35.50%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-50.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-1333.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
26.62%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PANW's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-10.97%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.86%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to PANW's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.70%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.