PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-17.00%
Negative yoy D&A while PANW is 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
105.48%
Well above PANW's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-76.86%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
586.33%
Well above PANW's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
169.42%
AR growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.85%
Growth well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-977.46%
Both negative yoy, with PANW at -110.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
8.66%
Some CFO growth while PANW is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.84%
Negative yoy CapEx while PANW is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. PANW's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-7.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PANW at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.13%
Investing outflow well above PANW's 100.00%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to PANW's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
200.53%
Issuance growth of 200.53% while PANW is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-120.27%
We cut yoy buybacks while PANW is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.